Collection agency and call center in messaging apps: the economics of switching from calls to chat

The one who doesn’t pick up the phone often reads messages. The question is what you do about it.

An operator dials the hundredth number of the day. Rings, rejections, “busy,” voicemail. The head of collections looks at the report: the connect rate is falling, the shifts are the same, and the cost of one conversation keeps rising. Meanwhile the same person who ignored the call reads a message on their phone an hour later.

Below: how the head of a collections service or call center can weigh a move to messaging apps. What changes for people and shifts, how to measure the effect on your own data, and where the law draws its lines. This is for the creditor company or agency, not advice for debtors.

Why people answer messages more readily

The reason is simple and has nothing to do with technology. A call demands an answer at once, at an inconvenient moment, often with others around. Many people simply don’t answer an unknown number. A message doesn’t press: it is read at a convenient time, thought over, and answered when the person is ready to talk.

That doesn’t mean the person will pay. It means contact happens more often and the conversation is calmer. What matters to you is not “they replied” but what came next: a date was named, a reason explained, restructuring requested, or silence.

There is a second advantage: a conversation leaves a trace. The promise is recorded in the person’s own words, the date is visible, and there is no argument about what was said.

What changes in workload, shifts and oversight

Operator workload

A call takes a person completely. A conversation in writing allows several conversations at once: the operator replies while another client is thinking. But don’t expect the workload simply to shrink. It changes: fewer empty dials, more reading, careful wording and written answers to objections.

Shifts

Calls are tied to a narrow window when someone is likely to pick up. Messaging blurs it: a reply may arrive in the evening or early morning. You will need to decide who answers outside the main shift and within what limits, and fix that in rules. Sending hours are also restricted by law, more on that below.

Oversight

This is where the gain is most visible. A call can be recorded, but listening takes long and is done selectively. You can read a conversation quickly, and it shows what a call loses: tone, pressure, violations, extra promises made on behalf of the company. A habit is enough: once a week you read a few conversations from each operator and go through them one-on-one.

But oversight without respect for people turns into surveillance. More on that: monitoring team chats without spying.

How to measure the effect on your own data

Other people’s numbers are no use to you, they aren’t about your debtors. You need four figures you measure yourself.

1. Connect rate against reply rate

Calls: how many attempts led to a conversation. Messaging: how many sent messages got a reply. Count by people, not attempts, or repeats will distort the picture. Compare like with like: the same type of debt and the same period.

2. Promises and how many are kept

A reply is not money. Count how many people named a date and how many of them kept it. If there are many promises and few kept, messaging gives an illusion of movement. Simple discipline helps: the operator writes down the date the person named and, on that day, marks whether the word was kept. More on this: payment promises in chat.

3. Cost per contact

Add up the costs: operator time, communication, numbers, the tool. Divide by the number of real contacts, meaning conversations where the person actually answered on the substance. Compare with calls over the same period. Don’t forget replacing blocked numbers: it is a real line of expense.

4. The result in money

The final measure: how much was recovered per group and in what time. Don’t credit messaging with what would have happened anyway. That is why you need a control group.

Legality and ethics

This is not a formality but the boundary beyond which the economics stop making sense: fines, complaints and lost reputation will outweigh any gain.

• The collection law of your country. In many countries it limits contact hours, frequency, channels and message content. Requirements differ, so check them with a lawyer, not with articles found online.
• Personal data. Check on what basis you write to a person and how you store conversations and numbers.
• Sending hours. Don’t write at night or in hours that law or contract excludes. Put it in written procedure and spot-check it rather than rely on an operator’s memory.
• Tone. No threats, humiliation or pressure. A calm, clear text works better and is safe for the company.
• Third parties. A person’s debt concerns only that person. Messages to relatives, colleagues and acquaintances are allowed only where and as far as the law permits, and must never reveal what the debt is about.
• A request to stop. If a person asks you not to write, it must be recorded and respected.

Pilot and scaling

1. Pick one group. Similar debts, a clear overdue period, enough volume.
2. Set up a control group. The same structure, worked the old way.
3. Agree the rules with a lawyer. Hours, frequency, texts, what must not be written.
4. Assign a small team. Operators who can write, not only talk.
5. Measure the four figures. Replies, promises, kept promises, cost per contact. Weekly, with the same definitions.
6. Decide on the data. If the result is weaker than calls, stop and understand why. If better, add groups gradually.
7. Scale with a reserve of numbers. The load on accounts grows with volume, and one number must not carry all the work.

What to decide before choosing a tool

The move to messaging rests not on software but on decisions the head of collections makes. Make them before you start comparing options:

• Whose base it is. Conversations and numbers must belong to the company, not the operator. Settle this before launch, or the first person to leave takes part of the portfolio. More: the company’s work numbers.
• Which figures you need. The four above, by operator and by group. Write the definitions down in advance so that a month later nobody argues about what counts as a reply.
• Who owns what. Who records promises, who checks whether they were kept, who reads conversations and how often.
• What the procedure is. Hours, frequency, tone, forbidden topics, third parties. In writing and agreed with a lawyer.
• What you are ready to change in the team. Hire operators who can write. Rebuild shifts. Review conversations one-on-one instead of only counting calls.

Once you have these answers, the conversation about a CRM for messengers gets short: you already know what you need. On general criteria: how to choose a CRM for messengers. What it looks like from the inside we show at the introduction, not on a page.

Checklist: a collections pilot in messaging apps

• One pilot group and a control group for it are chosen
• Four figures are defined: replies, promises, kept promises, cost per contact
• Rules on hours, frequency and tone are agreed with a lawyer
• Operators understand that third parties must not be written to
• A request “do not write” is recorded and respected
• Every promise has a date and someone responsible for checking it
• The head of collections reads operators’ conversations every week
• There is a reserve of work numbers in case of limitations
• The decision to scale is made on pilot data

If you can’t answer at least three of these, it is too early to start. Begin with the numbers you already have.

---

Those who answer a message don’t always pick up the phone. You already know that.